Jesus started a movement, not a religion.

—Original Post—

I saw this sign on the way downtown the other day and liked it enough to snap a picture with my cell phone. I did a little research and think they might be right about this. While historical evidence for the existence of Jesus outside of the Bible is tenuous this is a concept worth exploring for it would make sense that  Jesus, like millions of others, would have been sick of the brutal and oppressive Roman rule.

There a few historical sources regularly cited as evidence for the existence of Jesus outside of the bible. They include Pliny the younger and Tacitus, both came at least 20 or 30 years after Jesus would have died and are a matter of great debate. For the sake of argument this article will assume Jesus existed, at the very least, as a charismatic wise man a little over 2000 years ago in or near Jerusalem.

So, according the Bible, Jesus was a Jewish peasant living under Roman rule a little over 2000 years ago. What might he, and other peasants, be sick of? They lived under a dictator that ruled by bloodshed and conquest. While the Roman rule did bring a great deal more peace and freedom there were some very high prices that needed to be paid:

  • Women: Cicero summarized Roman treatment of women in one line: “Our ancestors, in their wisdom, considered that all women, because of their innate weakness, should be under the control of guardians” Women had no real rights at all, marriages were almost always arranged and had only a little more freedom than under traditional Islam.
  • Slavery: Slavery was common and rampant. The slaves were the lowest of the low in Roman culture and anyone with love in their heart (as Jesus would have) would find treating people this way abhorrent.
  • Viciousness: Romans were vicious and violent. Throwing people to the lions was very entertaining and those civilians that were problematic were subjected to beatings, torture and crucifixion.

Roman peasants lived in dirty, squalid houses that could collapse or burn at any moment. Education, human rights and medical care were virtually non-existent and they lived in constant fear of their rulers. There was certainly a lot of things worth fighting for and so it stands to reason the someone like Jesus would have tried to teach people how to live and fight for a better life.

So if Jesus started a movement it would have most certainly been anti-roman establishment and that, as well know, would lead to to a torturous death. Jesus never expressed wanting followers or a religion, just change and what he said was his message from God. So the United Church that I saw this sign at was probably right about this. If Jesus did exist he had a good cause indeed. Even more importantly though, he didn’t set out to start a religion. He only wanted to help people live a better life, a message all churches could learn from.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Jesus started a movement, not a religion.

  1. archdragon87 says:

    Jesus did say to obey the laws of Moses, so it’s quite likely he would have had similar views on woman and slavery as the Romans you mentioned.
    He quite literally called the apostles and chastised people for not acting according to what he thought was right, so although he may not have wanted followers in a religious sense, he clearly wanted people to follow his example.
    Your absolutely right about him not wanting to start a religion though. He was a Jew, he already had a religion. His involvement was never meant to be the start of a new religion, it was the continuation of an old one.
    Sorry to come down so heavy on what was clearly meant to be a more positive post, but often I find even non-belivers defending parts of the New Testiment, and although I agree it’s a big step forward from the Old it still has a lot of problems that shouldn’t be overlooked.

    • bryanbr says:

      Ya a few people complained about historical accuracy here but I think I will leave it because the point remains the same regardless: Jesus would have wanted a better life for the Jews, not another damn religion.

  2. I can’t help it, Bryan, I like you. Valuable post with some compelling thoughts. Thanks.

  3. Tracys Post says:

    They just recently did an in depth look at what Jesus’ life might have been like on the history channel. And that is the same vibe I got, that he didn’t like what was going on with the Romans and started his own movement.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s